Click on the image above to learn more about the M1 Carbine
|
Finface's M1 Carbine Photo Gallery |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
Finface
Recruit
Joined: Jan 03 2026 Location: Kentucky Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Finface's M1 Carbine Photo GalleryPosted: Feb 22 2026 at 3:47pm |
|
New Forum Friends,
Thanks to all for your replies to my various "newbie" posts and questions. A lot more to learn, and perhaps this thread can serve as an exploration of my carbine's origins and attributes. I welcome all comments and thoughts. I'm going to try to post 9 photos of the rifle now, each a little different perspective. If these post okay then later I will upload closeups of the rifle's identifying features. Hopefully this will be a fun exercise for you. I know it will be educational for me. Finface |
|
![]() |
|
Finface
Recruit
Joined: Jan 03 2026 Location: Kentucky Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 22 2026 at 3:58pm |
|
Hmmm...my workaround of emailing myself "large" size photos (instead of "original") and then uploading them into a post, which worked for pictures of the sight, isn't working now. I don't know why because the photos are about 500KB and the photo size limit is 2 MB. I'm getting the message "Error loading preview. Please check the path and name are correct."
Also when I bring up the "insert image" pop-up the left side is full of previous photos (the sling, etc.). I don't want those for this thread, but I can't seem to delete them. Also two attempts to upload the new photo show them listed in this box - but about 1/4 the byte size of the "large" that I'm trying to pull up from my Mac's desktop - and they aren't uploading.
|
|
![]() |
|
Finface
Recruit
Joined: Jan 03 2026 Location: Kentucky Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 22 2026 at 4:06pm |
|
"uploads/7831/_Serial_5051728_#1.jpeg", is what's showing, with "uploads/7831/ pre-populated before I try and upload, and then after trying to "upload" it adds "_Serial_5051728_#1.jpeg", which is what I labeled the photo (without the underlines - it added those to my label. Oh, well, time to watch some golf on TV.
|
|
![]() |
|
New2brass
Moderator Group
Dan Pinto, How Can I help Joined: Nov 29 2015 Location: CCC Status: Offline Points: 5527 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 23 2026 at 8:03am |
|
Are these the pictures you are trying to upload? Are you going to your file cabinet to upload and then post, or uploading while making the post in the post box? ![]() ![]() ![]() Fin, please do not delete photos that are used in a previous post, this makes that thread useless for the next new guy looking for information. how to upload pictures Common problems uploading. Uploading pictures can take over ten time as it takes to download a picture. This is not the forum (for the most part) it is how the internet servers works. When you request an upload and think nothing is happening and click upload again, it adds the same image to the upload queue. The forum sees the same name and adds the date and time to the file name. The forum does not handle empty spaces and some characters in a file name. the hash tag may be the problem. Low score (underline) is appropriate if you want to separate words. Starting with a low score may be an issue. New issues with forum uploads and the reasons for errors, with the advent of AI our forum is being bombarded with search and index engines. This has been logged at over 2 million hits a day! When too many are one the forum at once it exceeds the forum bandwidth. When this happens a error message will generate. We recently added HTTPS protocol which has features to suppress the searches. This has increased the costs to the club and the jury is still out on just how well it is working. Another issue is getting false malicious codes in pictures. We have found for the most part if you just wait and try again, sometimes more than once, it will upload. If anyone has persistent issues with a specific picture they want uploaded, please contact me and I can fix and get uploaded. This in part may be now when you edit a picture, the program may be adding meta data to a image to identify that it was altered. New technology that is out is bogging down everything and I am sure the developers are working on fixing these issues. Please be patient. |
|
![]() |
|
Finface
Recruit
Joined: Jan 03 2026 Location: Kentucky Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 23 2026 at 12:09pm |
|
[QUOTE=New2brass]
Are these the pictures you are trying to upload? Are you going to your file cabinet to upload and then post, or uploading while making the post in the post box? ![]() ![]() ![]() Thank you for the detailed reply, New2Brass. I'll respond to your suggestions in this reply instead of just trying them (maybe others can follow what happened and avoid it for themselves) - and try again. Did I successfully uploaded those three pictures above, or did you (or some other helpful moderator?) upload them after I emailed them to you? I know I uploaded some photos. I didn't have the problems I'm having now by doing the trick of taking iPhone photos from my Apple Photos app and emailing them to myself. To get around the individual photo size restriction of this forum I selected "Large", instead of "Original". This step, and maybe cropping them, reduced each photo's size down from over 2 MB photo resolution of my iPhone to just under 400KB (397KB - I guess I got lucky there!). The forum's upload process then had no problem. I read your link below and see in a post that in 2016 the forum's photo size limit was 400KB. Is it still 400KB? I had cropped the original photos down to magnify detail, and I'm guessing that step helped reduce the photo's file sizes below 400KB. The 9 new photos I want to upload (first step, photos of the entire rifle, magnified/cropped photos of parts like above to follow) after emailing as "Large" are more like 500KB. I will try and crop them further to get 'em below 400KB if that is still a limitation. So right there may be why they didn't upload. "Fin, please do not delete photos that are used in a previous post, this makes that thread useless for the next new guy looking for information." Roger no deleting. I did try last night a couple of times by highlighting the old photos (the ones above) and commanding "command, delete", thinking there was some kind of limitation or cache that was stopping me. I don't think I actually deleted any of them. It didn't look like that happened. "how to upload pictures "Common problems uploading. Uploading pictures can take over ten time as it takes to download a picture. This is not the forum (for the most part) it is how the internet servers works. When you request an upload and think nothing is happening and click upload again, it adds the same image to the upload queue. The forum sees the same name and adds the date and time to the file name." I have high speed fiber optic internet and a new Apple computer. I'll keep "uploading takes longer than downloading" in mind and be patient. With the above successfully uploaded photos, once I got them resized it didn't take much time to see them accepted as a "preview", and then be able to post them. I'll be patient, and keep in mind what you say below about this new phenomenon of servers getting overwhelmed by massive AI searches. "The forum does not handle empty spaces and some characters in a file name. The hash tag may be the problem. Low score (underline) is appropriate if you want to separate words. Starting with a low score may be an issue." Good to know, Thx! I found my email of January 19th to myself (two of the same above photos were in that email to myself) and see that I did not rename those photos. IMG_0971.jpeg and IMG_0972.jpeg is what they were labeled by my computer, and without checking right now probably what they are labeled in the File Manager window (where I tried to delete). Not descriptive of the photo content so last night I tried some plain language changes to keep track of/describe the new photos. I will remove those probable bad actor characters, while still trying to label the photos as what they are, and try again. "New issues with forum uploads and the reasons for errors, with the advent of AI our forum is being bombarded with search and index engines. This has been logged at over 2 million hits a day! When too many are one the forum at once it exceeds the forum bandwidth. When this happens an error message will generate. We recently added HTTPS protocol which has features to suppress the searches. This has increased the costs to the club and the jury is still out on just how well it is working." I'll take your word for it! "Another issue is getting false malicious codes in pictures. We have found for the most part if you just wait and try again, sometimes more than once, it will upload. If anyone has persistent issues with a specific picture they want uploaded, please contact me and I can fix and get uploaded. This in part may be now when you edit a picture, the program may be adding meta data to an image to identify that it was altered." Thank you for the generous offer of your time! Finface
|
|
![]() |
|
welbytwo
Hard Corps
Advanced Collector Joined: Jan 01 2016 Location: Indiana Status: Offline Points: 931 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 23 2026 at 2:29pm |
|
I gave up trying to post fotos here, is very doable if you got a good memory to remember how--if you want to restore your gun to proper rear sight you are lucky as stake marks look to be for a flip sight--a BR, N-A, Square S, round S and I think TN would all be proper used sights in that serial range-wont be cheap
|
|
![]() |
|
Smokpole
Hard Corps
Joined: Oct 21 2019 Location: Madison ohio Status: Offline Points: 1484 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 23 2026 at 3:58pm |
|
Marcus! You are beginning to sound like me! In order to learn something new, I have to forget something old!
|
|
|
OGCA Life member
NRA Life member Ashtabula Rod and Gun Life member |
|
![]() |
|
Finface
Recruit
Joined: Jan 03 2026 Location: Kentucky Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 24 2026 at 1:32pm |
Thanks for the suggestion - your level of understanding sounds very high to quote those sight varieties. I've already been scolded for interrogating AI websites ChatGPT and Gemini, but in my use of these question and answer platforms a couple of months ago the issue of the correctness of my range adjustable rear sight was suggested as being potentially correct. However they came up with the determination, AI said an Inland Division M-1 Carbine manufactured in the timeframe of the stamp on my barrel - 03-44 - could have had the more modern sight put on it at the factory. Do you, or others in the know, disagree with that being a possibility?
|
|
![]() |
|
painter777
Hard Corps
Joined: Feb 18 2016 Location: Central MI Status: Offline Points: 2352 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 24 2026 at 1:53pm |
|
I have Inland 5,061,2xx with a .U. Flip Sight, Unmarked Type II Barrel Band in Low Wood OI Stock.
Ruth mentions Inland getting Underwood complete and Rear Flip Sight Parts in early 1944. Appears, As mentioned before that Finfaces Adj sight may have been installed on a different carbine at one time, because of the Punch marks on it and NO sign of those extending on to the Dovetails of his receiver. Looks to me that way... Charlie-P777
|
|
|
Living Free because of those that serve.....
|
|
![]() |
|
Finface
Recruit
Joined: Jan 03 2026 Location: Kentucky Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 24 2026 at 2:36pm |
Thank you. I thought I'd identified those "punch marks", which someone here told me to look for by sliding the rear sight all the way to the left (as it is in the photo in this thread), as belonging to a redesigned rear sight that was originally installed in about March, 1944. So are punch marks only associated with installation of the earlier flip sights? No punch marks ever for the newer design?
|
|
![]() |
|
Finface
Recruit
Joined: Jan 03 2026 Location: Kentucky Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 24 2026 at 2:47pm |
|
Friends...sigh...
I cropped down the photos and now the "get info" feature of my Mac says they are all under 400KB. I labeled them with only numbers and letters, with no underscores, and the file ".jpeg" at the end of my label I never even highlighted while renaming. Now I can see part of the photo after clicking on "upload". Curiously the KB value seems to be about half of what "get info" says once the photo is displayed in the File Manager box. The photo does show in the preview box, and it has sliders up and sideways so only part of the photo is visible at one time. When I click on okay I get this pop up message - "Error uploading file!!.
The file failed the security scan and has been deleted as it may contain malicous code" That is a cut and paste, so the misspelling of malicious as malicous is not my doing. I can't fathom why this message would be triggered. It is a photo I took with my iPhone, emailed to myself as "large", dragged from my email onto my Mac's desktop, relabeled, and then tried to upload. I may take up the moderator's offer to email them to him so he can post them for me, as he did in this thread. Mr. Moderator, writing this post as a Post Reply I can't scroll up to see who you are - apologies.
Edited by W5USMC - Feb 25 2026 at 4:46pm |
|
![]() |
|
Matt_X
Hard Corps
Joined: Nov 10 2020 Location: Phila, Penn Status: Offline Points: 1047 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 24 2026 at 4:11pm |
|
I had that same issue "possible malicious code" message a few weeks ago. Not sure what caused it. Not using a Mac. One of the mods took care of it for me and experimented with trimming the edges for possible code, but not clear there actually was an issue. All I can say is come back and try again. I had no trouble a few days later. jpeg or jpg Looking in my profile, all of the photo images I stored here are jpg |
|
![]() |
|
New2brass
Moderator Group
Dan Pinto, How Can I help Joined: Nov 29 2015 Location: CCC Status: Offline Points: 5527 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 24 2026 at 7:22pm |
|
The file limit is 500KB and states so on the lower left of the box you use to upload pictures. I have a I-phone, but a regular PC. it seems I have issues when I send photos to my computer to alter and upload. I am thinking the Iphone may have code built in for the moving "live" pictures or maybe for the native HEIC pictures that I cannot open on my computer? But knowing who is having issues on what devices might help narrow down the area the forum vendor can look at. I will send you an email for where to send photos and I will get them installed in your file space.
|
|
![]() |
|
New2brass
Moderator Group
Dan Pinto, How Can I help Joined: Nov 29 2015 Location: CCC Status: Offline Points: 5527 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 26 2026 at 7:04am |
|
pics were added above
|
|
![]() |
|
Finface
Recruit
Joined: Jan 03 2026 Location: Kentucky Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 26 2026 at 9:45am |
|
Thanks for uploading!
So first these photos of the whole rifle, slightly different angles. I printed a copy of the Data Sheet and will follow along with those of you who might want to also do that - and tell me what boxes to check. I know it won't be definitive without actual physical inspection, but hopefully with your help the authenticity (or lack thereof) of this carbine can be established with some high degree of confidence. No hurry on this process, either. For each topic area two or three weeks before another topic. Then should I ask to have another group of photos posted that are part specific? Or location specific? Or maybe function specific? However addressed it will be fun to fill out a Data Sheet with help. So first...from the photos of the whole rifle...perhaps some general comments on the appearance of the rifle?
|
|
![]() |
|
Matt_X
Hard Corps
Joined: Nov 10 2020 Location: Phila, Penn Status: Offline Points: 1047 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 26 2026 at 10:09am |
The question is because of the specific punch upset the metal. We a see short chisel tipped punch was used on this dovetail. We can then reference other examples to see if this was commonly done at Inland. Adjustable sights often have a stake that matches the round holes, but while some here may know off the top of their head whether Inland did that, I can't.
|
|
![]() |
|
Skippy
Recruit
Joined: Feb 20 2025 Location: PNW Status: Offline Points: 74 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 26 2026 at 11:14am |
|
Hello Finface. Have you splurged on Carbine Club Newsletter #361 yet? This newsletter has very detailed information on carbines in your serial number range and can answer many of your questions, including your question on rear sights and their stake marks. You can get a copy of the newsletter by following this link. https://www.uscarbinecal30.com/forum/sale-of-ccnl-back-issues-and-quick-index_topic5769.html |
|
![]() |
|
Finface
Recruit
Joined: Jan 03 2026 Location: Kentucky Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 26 2026 at 12:24pm |
|
No, I haven't gotten that newsletter yet. Thanks for the reminder.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |