Print Page | Close Window

Improved Sling for the Carbine

Printed From: The Carbine Collector's Club
Category: The Club
Forum Name: Newsworthy Items
Forum Description: Newsletters and Featured Carbines
Printed Date: Mar 25 2023 at 10:53pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 -

Topic: Improved Sling for the Carbine
Posted By: Lupus Dei
Subject: Improved Sling for the Carbine
Date Posted: Dec 21 2015 at 8:47pm

January 2016-F

uploads/CCNLs/CC201612InfBd1666improvedsling.pdf" rel="nofollow -
Click for PDF

by Marty Black

The carbine’s sling went through some minor changes during WWII. Among the approximately 12
manufacturers, some variation exists in color, thickness and weave of material, contour of the C-shaped
end tabs (tips), and the size and shape of the buckle.

However, some general statements can be made: The earliest slings varied in color: tan, very light
green, or a dull mustard/bronze color, with thin C-shaped end tabs and a very narrow buckle that was
extremely difficult to adjust. The color of the sling changed to a more consistent khaki/light green, and
then a dark OD green beginning in late 1943 - early 1944. The C-shaped end tabs were made stronger
and slightly thicker. Inexplicably, the opening in the sling well of the stock was never made larger to
accommodate the thicker slings, making it very difficult to attach and remove the later slings from the

Sometime after the end of the war, probably during the Korean War of 1950-1953, the shape of the end
tabs was changed to a solid D-shape, making the sling nearly identical in construction to that used by the
Marines on their Reising submachine gun. This change made it even more difficult to push the sling
through the sling slot and around the oiler of the carbine stock.

The Infantry (Test) Board at Fort Benning, Georgia released a report on 23 August 1944, detailing the
testing of an “improved” sling for the carbine, which used the hardware from the canvas M1 Sling “to
eliminate the difficulties encountered in adjusting the standard sling.”

It appears that the test board was confused about encountering both types of carbine sling buckles,
which were described as ‘slip buckles’ and ‘slip lock buckles’ throughout this report. “Standard carbine
slings obtained at Fort Benning were equipped with one of two sizes of slip buckles…At one time in the
past, a larger slip lock buckle was used on the standard sling. If this was before the introduction of the
smaller slip buckle, it is apparent that the adoption of the smaller slip lock buckle was a mistake.
However, if the larger slip buckle was introduced after the smaller slip buckle, then it is apparent that the
deficiency of the smaller slip lock buckle was recognized, and the problem has been solved in a most
efficacious manner.”

It is not known if the slings with the “smaller slip buckles” were NOS (new, old stock), or whether one
or more subcontractors were still producing slings with these buckles in 1944.

A. End of Standard Sling, which is looped through upper sling swivel.
B. End of Improved Sling, which is attached to upper sling swivel.
C. End of Standard Sling, which is looped through lower sling swivel. Note the (small) three bar
slip lock buckle.
D. End of Improved Sling, which is looped through lower sling swivel. Note quick release type

Note in figure B, that a “metal snap fastener” from an M1 Sling has been sewn on. The “quick release
type buckle” in Figure D is also from the M1 Sling.

The description of the photo above buckle and large three bar slip lock buckle.”
Several tests were conducted to determine if the Improved Sling was a
large enough improvement over the Standard Sling to warrant adoption.

The last two tests comprised “24 hours of continuous adjustment, with even and jerky tension, wet and
dry”…followed by “24 hours of repeatedly installing the slings, adjusting them, then removing the
slings from the carbines.”

The results: “The female component of the lift-the-dot fastener on the standard sling became weak, but
upon completion of the test was still effective. The metal tip of the lower end of the sling came off in
the seventeenth hour (of the latter test). There was very little evidence of wear on the web…

The hardware of the subject sling (improved sling) showed no wear. The loose end portion of the web
upon which the quick release buckle slides began to show extreme wear and fraying in the nineteenth
hour (of the latter test). At the end of the twenty-fourth hour, it was shredded. The quick release buckle
was, however, still fairly effective in locking the web.

The Infantry Board concludes:
1. That there is no military requirement for any change from the slip buckle type adjustment of the
carbine sling to another type, nor for any change from the standard method of attachment of the
sling to the carbine.
2. That the small slip buckle, although very effective in locking, is needlessly difficult to operate
when making sling adjustment.
3. That the larger slip buckle is the most desirable size and is the most satisfactory buckle for the
carbine sling.
4. That the subject Improved sling presents no essential advantage over the standard carbine sling
sufficient to warrant a change to the former.
5. That the smaller slip buckles, although more difficult to operate, should be used until the supply
is exhausted, and then replaced by the larger slip buckle.

The Infantry Board recommends:
1. That no further consideration be given to the Improved (subject) carbine sling.
2. That the larger size slip buckle, if not already standard, be made standard for use on the standard
carbine sling.
3. That stocks of the small slip buckle be used until stocks are exhausted, and thereafter replaced
with the larger size.”

Louis Dey

Posted By: New2brass
Date Posted: Feb 16 2016 at 12:12am
Interesting as how the improved sling was similar to the Garand sling. They claim to be difficult to operate but mainstay on the M1 Garand. I have German leather slings with same device.

Posted By: m1a1fan
Date Posted: Feb 16 2016 at 8:08pm
Wonder if the D tip cap coming off led to a design change?

Posted By: Marty Black
Date Posted: Feb 17 2016 at 12:02am
Actually M1A1 Fan, it was the C-tab that came off. This was a problem with the carbine slings. Those C-tabs were too thin, light-weight, and didn't sufficiently "grab" onto the canvas of the sling. The Marines' Reising canvas sling used the stronger and thicker D-tab, as did the Army's and Marines' backpack straps and other field gear. In fact, I cannot think of any other WWII slings or equipment straps that used the flimsy and weak C-tab. The C-tab idea surely came from the original Winchester design for the carbine sling, which is illustrated on page 62 of War Baby.

Regards, Marty Black

Marty Black

Posted By: wd4ngb
Date Posted: Apr 10 2016 at 12:28pm
When I was in Nam in 66, there were several M2 carbine in use. These had the M1 Garand stle slings. I could only find 1 photo of one showing the adjuster. 

I found a source for them, and added to my carbine that I actively shoot. 

Love It....

Retired Army, 22 years.

Posted By: Marty Black
Date Posted: Apr 10 2016 at 5:07pm
Thanks WD4NGB,

I agree that the Garand sling is sturdier and easier to adjust than the Carbine sling, especially those nylon carbine slings of the Vietnam era that had very small narrow adjusting buckles on both ends. Difficult and time-consuming to adjust. Lousy, really, a piece of junk. They weren't even worth collecting in the old days, when they were still available on the surplus market (although some carbine restorers would buy them for the small narrow adjusting buckles, which were virtually identical to the early buckles on carbine slings.)

Different subject: I am curious if you have found the stabilizing aspect of a sling on your arm (while shooting a carbine) outweighs the risk of opening up your groups.

In my experience, even the slightest amount of pressure on the sling will cause your groups to go wild. Watching other shooters, I've seen guys shoot very well with the sling on their arm, and others experience the same problem as I've had. As you may know, the metallurgy of the carbine barrel leaves much to be desired (too soft) and the pull of the sling has the same result as other shooters first experienced with the M16/AR15's barrel whip (vibration). Hence, the "floated barrel" modification for those rifles. Thanks for your report.

Regards, Marty Black (21 years Navy).

Marty Black

Posted By: Marty Black
Date Posted: Apr 10 2016 at 5:49pm
Say wd4ngb,

I forgot to ask earlier, Is that YOUR photo next to your user-name alongside your post? Were you in MACV?

If so, the Carbine Club made you famous (ha!) by putting you on the cover of our Newsletter 376 in October 2013.

Regards, Marty Black

Marty Black

Posted By: wd4ngb
Date Posted: Apr 10 2016 at 6:10pm
Yea, along with 5th SF and 101st. I have only casually used the sling with it, but you are correct, in that it is not heat treated to the extent as some more modern rifles. I started out with the old Garand, the the 14. They were not affected by the sling, unless after a lot of firing and getting hot. I was using a 14A1E1 in Nam at 1st, but just too big for most places. Took the bipod off it after the 1st day getting it hung up on some brush. Always have loved the little carbine.

Retired Army, 22 years.

Posted By: wd4ngb
Date Posted: Apr 16 2016 at 10:57pm
This sling is like the M1 Garand style sling, but 1 inch wide like the Carbine's sling. I liked it so much better for shooting, so made a little page about it, and where you can get one." rel="nofollow -

Retired Army, 22 years.

Posted By: Marty Black
Date Posted: Apr 17 2016 at 12:12pm
Ah, very interesting, thanks. When we published your photo in Newsletter 376, I wondered if we'd ever be able to identify that GI. I wasn't able to open that link of your's, but I was using a weak hotel wifi, so will try again later at home. BTW, for CMP Carbine Matches, you must use the regular GI carbine sling or an exact modern duplicate. No modifications. And CMP rules specify that it can only be used as a "hasty sling." But as we know, the carbine sling was never intended to be used to stabilize one's shooting position "hold." It's just a carrying strap. And as I mentioned before, my results - with the sling - have been very inconsistent, although I've seen other shooters get great scores by using the sling. Those shooters who have a lot of "small bore" competitive experience have a real advantage over those of us who don't, of course. Regards, Marty Black

Marty Black

Posted By: wd4ngb
Date Posted: Apr 17 2016 at 12:24pm
There is a section on it about the history of the sling, with your research, with credit of course. :)

Retired Army, 22 years.

Posted By: norwich93
Date Posted: Sep 07 2022 at 8:30pm
Marty, I have the pre-war slings Winchester had considered as depicted in War Baby, its was one of my best scores.

Rob Clark

Posted By: Marty Black
Date Posted: Sep 07 2022 at 9:13pm
For sure! Pls post some closeup photos!   We'd love to see those slings. Thanks in advance, Marty Black

Marty Black

Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01 -
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. -