Click on the image above to learn more about the M1 Carbine
|
Help Identifying the Stamp on this Flat Bolt |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
Dirty30Carbine ![]() On Point ![]() ![]() Joined: Aug 24 2019 Location: Chester Status: Offline Points: 196 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: Nov 21 2021 at 9:12pm |
I recently pickled up a rearsenalled M1a1 and upon getting it apart, the bolt has a stamp on it I can't identify, I have asked several friends and we are all in the same boat. several ideas have been brought up. ill attach the best photo I can get, but if anyone messages me their number or email, ill send a video that's a little clearer. it is a blues flat bolt with the proof punch on it.
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
painter777 ![]() Hard Corps ![]() ![]() Joined: Feb 18 2016 Location: Central MI Status: Offline Points: 1559 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Dirty 30,
Odds are it's a Partially struck H.U. A bolt made by Howe Machinery for Underwood. We see these Miss-Stamped every now and then. I believe when they try stamping too close to the bottom of the Bolts left lug, the top of the stamp hits part of the lug, Distorting the marking..... Just like your example. Sometimes when struck like I described they may look like just the bottom half of the H. with a short topped U. Sometimes the H looks like a R with part of the top missing. It all depends on how badly the stamp was impeded by bumping the bolt lug. **OK, I found it. Look at this article, which includes some other miss-stamps... etc 1 being like your H.U. bolt. HTH, Charlie-P777 |
|
Living Free because of those that serve.....
|
|
![]() |
|
painter777 ![]() Hard Corps ![]() ![]() Joined: Feb 18 2016 Location: Central MI Status: Offline Points: 1559 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From the link I added. This one looking like a partial R. and U. because of the top of the H missing ![]() |
|
Living Free because of those that serve.....
|
|
![]() |
|
Dirty30Carbine ![]() On Point ![]() ![]() Joined: Aug 24 2019 Location: Chester Status: Offline Points: 196 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It looks almost just like the H.U. Thank you so much.
|
|
![]() |
|
New2brass ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Dan Pinto, Photo Editor Joined: Nov 29 2015 Location: CT Status: Offline Points: 4247 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We do not know for sure that it was Howe, But I am sated my case as to why it is probably Howe. It could possibly be Petrolium Heat and Power Maybe one day we can check the box by finding concrete evidence. The one in odd markings I was thinking an outside possibility of K.U as
well as R.U., but most likely H.U. as stated bashed up a bit. If there was a K.U you would know who I say made it. The R.U. sparked the seed of the article above as there is no R ( or V, X, Y, Z) subcontractors to Underwood. This lack of R was instrumental in my theory of the system Underwood used.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |