Winchester 6,508,480

Rebel92 wrote: I must be dense. I just cannot see any difference in any of them. I can spot “humped” parts pretty good, but the cartouches I cannot see. I did compare my I cut rockola stock to this one and could see a few differences. And my others are so worn I cannot tell.

So with the picture I PM'd you along with the things to check against your CC, you don't see any difference when comparing side by side? Look closer :)

I looked at both of my correct winnys, my CC are different then yours. I have a 5mil and 6mil winny

got a new stock. I have a question though, it is a very very tight fit in regards to getting the barrel band to slide over the stock and the retaining spring. Like so tough, had to tap it using my rubber handles scewdriver to tap the bayonet lug down onto the stock. Is this normal, or what’s my issue 

I backed the screw as far as it would go on the barrel band and it slipped over easier, but still very very tight. Barrel band isn’t bent. Not sure why it’s so tight. It fits on handguard and all that very good. 

Makes Sense GotSnlB. I dont think this one has been sanded at all. recoil plat sits well below wood.

What does your barrel hang look like with the action in this new stock?

Looks like it went on without gouging the wood on the nose or anything like that, I would consider that good that it's tight, especially if you're going to be shooting it. That is an interesting rear sight, I have never seen one with a stud and a notch cut out in the peep to keep it from going off the front. I'm a newbie on this stuff so they may be common for all I know but I just thought it was interesting

Also common on J.A.O. (J.A. Otterbein) stamped rear sights.