The Carbine Collectors Club

Click on the image above to learn more about the M1 Carbine


Forum Home Forum Home > The Club > Carbine Accessories
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login


USGI Oilers

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
Marty Black View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Editor in Chief Emeritus

Joined: Dec 30 2015
Location: Pismo Beach, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 100339
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (3) Thanks(3)   Quote Marty Black Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 18 2017 at 11:57pm
Thinking a bit more about oilers....

1. I found some notes from my International Silver research trip in 1985. There is a book of documents and illustrations on IS's oiler and magazine manufacture at the Meriden Historical Society, 424 West Main Street, Meriden, CT. I hope a new collector pays them a visit to learn what I may have missed.

2. Craig Reisch's oiler identification table on page 148 of his 7th Edition Book, is a "disaster," to use someone else's favorite word.

For Winchester, Reisch identifies IW, BW, and SW. IW is correct from first production to early 1943, then IS is how Winchester's oilers were marked.

I've never heard of a BW oiler.

SW oilers - if they were made for Winchester, he needs to show some proof. The master list of carbine subcontractors lists only International Silver as Winchester's subcontractor for oilers. According to this subcontractor list, Stanley Works (SW) made only 3 items for the carbine: Mags and buttplates for IBM and 30-round mags for Winchester. Perhaps the master list is incomplete, but my guess is that SW oilers are postwar spare parts for the Ordnance Department, or were made for the M3 "Grease Gun," not the carbine.

ISP oiler is identified as for Standard Products. Nonsense!   International Silver petitioned the government to cease marking oilers specific for carbine manufacturers - II, IW, IN, IU, IR, IQ, ISP - in January 1943, 6 months before Std Pro delivered a carbine. If Std Pro used ISP oilers, than we'd need ISG oilers for Saginaw Steering Gear, which produced carbines BEFORE Std Pro. Although documentation has never been found to prove this one way or the other, experienced collectors will put their money on ISP oilers being for Irwin-Pedersen, but the argument for that is beyond the scope of this posting. See Newsletter 347, by Brian Quick.

There is ample evidence that the II, IW, IN, IU, IR, IQ, ISP oilers were dulite/blue in color. They were easily found at gunshows in the 1970s-1980s. The switch to common gray/green parkerizing was made about the same time that International Silver got permission to mark all oilers with the generic IS marking - the spring of 1943. Decades ago, dulite/blue IS oilers could also be found. (I wish I hadn't sold my collection! Argh!)

Reisch also lists BK oilers as postwar, but Blake Manufacturing began producing oilers in late 1943 or early 1944, either as Ordnance Department spare parts or for the M3 "Grease Gun." We don't know which.

Be careful, guys....All the available collector books - by Ruth, Reisch, Canfield, and Larson contain lotsa errors. Don't believe everything you read!....except maybe MY posts! LOL.

Regards, Marty Black

Marty Black
Back to Top
David Albert View Drop Down
Hard Corps
Hard Corps
Avatar
Status Quo Challenger

Joined: Dec 27 2015
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 1003
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David Albert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 19 2017 at 10:37am
Marty,

You should write a book.

David Albert
dalbert@sturmgewehr.com
NRA Life Member
Past Pres., The American Thompson Association
Amer. Society of Arms Collectors
OGCA/TCA/Carbine Club/GCA/IAA
SAR Writer
Author - The Many Firearm Designs of Eugene Reising
Eagle Scout
Back to Top
Marty Black View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Editor in Chief Emeritus

Joined: Dec 30 2015
Location: Pismo Beach, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 100339
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Marty Black Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 19 2017 at 10:53am
Ha! Not me! I would obsess over every word, every sentence. I'd go into "word-smithing overload," fearful of writing something that wasn't quite perfect, something that someone else would find fault with.

Authoring a book would kill me, and the damn thing would never get done. I'd continue to proofread it over and over again until I died.

I'm happy just to be the old guy "voice of experience" to the new collectors.

Thanks for all your input to the Forum, Marty Black
Marty Black
Back to Top
sling00 View Drop Down
Hard Corps
Hard Corps


Joined: Apr 21 2016
Location: Tennessee
Status: Offline
Points: 941
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sling00 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 19 2017 at 11:42am
Just a pondering...Since all the other manufactures were just two letters, why wouldn't the oiler for the IPs just be something like IP.  Why the S in the middle of ISP?  


Back to Top
Marty Black View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Editor in Chief Emeritus

Joined: Dec 30 2015
Location: Pismo Beach, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 100339
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Marty Black Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 19 2017 at 12:17pm
Uh, oh! Pandora's box has just been opened! LOL.....Quick answer is that IP was the assigned code for all parts manufactured in-house by Irwin-Pedersen...so IP could not be used on International Silver's oilers. ISP was chosen, perhaps - just a guess - as a compromise between the names International Silver and Irwin-Pedersen.

The Ordnance Department initially set out very specific rules for how parts were to be marked...in regards to the prime contractor (the carbine maker) and the sub-contractor who manufactured parts for it. But as the carbine program expanded to 10 manufacturers and more than 1000 sub-contractors(!), things got very complicated quickly, with various sub-contractors having the same letters in their company name, and thus we see all kinds of parts code markings that "break the rules." It was a confusing mess, to say the least.

I'd recommend you get a copy of NL 347, and read the article written by Brian Quick. It's the most concise and logical argument for ISP being the code for Irwin-Pedersen's oilers.

And if you want to tie your brain up in a knot, look at Newsletter 384, page 15, for an article by Fred Powers, concerning 5 Standard Products sub-contractors, whose company name contained the letter S, the same letter assigned for the few parts made in-house by Standard Products. Some Ordnance Department clerk must've been pulling his/her hair out in assigning parts codes.   They certainly had to get "creative." And adding more confusion, SP and SS magazines are NOT Standard Products mags.

Wade Electric Products was a subcontractor of magazines to Saginaw Steering Gear. One would assume they would've been assigned WSG or something similar, but Wade Electric Products just marked their mags with WEP, and didn't bother adding a code for Saginaw. How did this happen? Perhaps they had a direct contract with the Ordnance Department prior to their sub-contract to Saginaw, and never got their code marking reassigned. That certainly would've been easier for them, simplifying their operation, but it broke the rules of the Ordnance Department.

No one said that carbine collecting was going to be easy! ha!

One last thing: As collectors, we tend to forget that the ONLY reason for the parts code markings, was for quality control purposes, in case parts failed in the field (think of a "recall"). No one in the carbine factories was looking at those codes. I am aware of only one such recall, and that was for a specific heat lot of a Springfield Armory bolt for the Garand rifle. Since the bolts were marked on top, it was easy to find them and remove them from rifles, and from spare parts inventories.

MB
Marty Black
Back to Top
sling00 View Drop Down
Hard Corps
Hard Corps


Joined: Apr 21 2016
Location: Tennessee
Status: Offline
Points: 941
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sling00 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 19 2017 at 3:25pm
I've read NL 347 followed with 384 pg 15...I'm through pondering for now.  :)
Back to Top
Marty Black View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Editor in Chief Emeritus

Joined: Dec 30 2015
Location: Pismo Beach, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 100339
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Marty Black Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 19 2017 at 11:02pm
OK Oiler Guys,

Here's one for you to figure out....I've got a totally unmarked oiler with a known WWII provenance. Mr. William Doerfner, General Manager of Saginaw Steering Gear from 1941-1965, gave me an un-serial numbered carbine that he brought home from the factory during WWII and used to hunt with at his cabin.   John Helveston, SG's "Gun Plant" Manager, had a "presentation type" carbine made for himself, and a nearly identical one made for his boss, Mr. Doerfner.

The carbine has an unmarked WWII sling and an unmarked oiler. The oiler has been blued and highly polished, but there is no evidence of a marking being ground off. Both the top and bottom of the oiler are smooth. The oiler has the leather washer and it's never had any oil in it.

I assume it's an International Silver oiler, but who knows? I've never seen an unmarked USGI oiler before.

My apologies for my poor photo skills - it's hard to take closeup photos of such a shiny piece.

BTW, the Helveston carbine (when purchased by a collector) did not have a sling or oiler, so we cannot compare. That carbine was blued, but the blueing has turned to a plum color.

Regards, Marty Black






Marty Black
Back to Top
sling00 View Drop Down
Hard Corps
Hard Corps


Joined: Apr 21 2016
Location: Tennessee
Status: Offline
Points: 941
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sling00 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 20 2017 at 9:52am
Now you have me pondering again... 
At first I thought perhaps the sling/oiler were added way post war using a Yankee Hill Machine oiler from 1972.  However this oiler has a leather gasket and the knurl pattern for this one is courser than the Yankee Hill.  So this isn't it.
As I saw somewhere, perhaps in the middle of these thousands of pages of CCNLs, the finish on the "presentation rifles" was a high gloss blued finish versus typical GI dull finishes.   Perhaps IS pulled some oilers prior to final processing and stamping just to polish them up for the presentation rifles and gifts to dignitaries (the guys with the checkbooks).  Especially if these rifles were made back when the oilers were still be park'd.  It's a thought?
Back to Top
Marty Black View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Editor in Chief Emeritus

Joined: Dec 30 2015
Location: Pismo Beach, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 100339
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Marty Black Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 20 2017 at 10:11am
Good point, Sling....yes, many (but not all) presentation carbines were blue (often polished to high gloss), and International Silver could've supplied such things to the manufacturers, on an as-needed basis.   They probably needed some for themselves as gifts. At the time that SG stopped producing carbines - spring 1944 - oilers were all IS and parkerized (to the best of our knowledge). We will never know exactly when the Doerfner and Helveston carbines were assembled. Both have #1 bands and flip sights.

Mr. Helveston's carbine has been blued and polished, but Mr. Doerfner's has GI parkerizing. And even the bolt is parkerized - yes, I know that's "impossible" for a WWII bolt, but there you have it! (Speaking of parkerized bolts, Mr. Runchey, the #3 man at Saginaw, who ran the IP/S'G' plant, put together an S'G' presentation-type carbine for Mr. Doerfner. It is totally parkerized, including the bolt!...but I digress again.)

The brilliant blue oiler is the only blue part on this carbine. Curiously, both of these unmarked carbines have highly-figured, highly polished Q-RMC high-wood stocks (and handguards)!

"Never say never, and never say always!"

Thanks much, MB
Marty Black
Back to Top
sling00 View Drop Down
Hard Corps
Hard Corps


Joined: Apr 21 2016
Location: Tennessee
Status: Offline
Points: 941
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sling00 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 25 2017 at 4:19pm

I took Marty’s advice and did the next best thing to visiting the Meriden Historical Society, I emailed them and got a prompt reply.  They sent me pictures of the 3 oiler drawings they could find.  Unfortunately drawings A196458 for the cap and A196456 for the washer were not in the book with the other drawings.  The Research Center is only open on Wednesdays so they will try again then.  So Marty, even though it was a few years ago, you were probably the last guy to look at these drawings which leads to the question… “What did you do with them?”   

Although the oiler drawing is included in NL 165, I have included a copy they sent me below.  If you compare this one to the NL there are a few subtle differences.  This one doesn’t say Master File but has a couple additional markings including an Eng Dept date stamp that looks like Dec 12, 1941.  So I’m not sure which is more correct.  I also attached a copy of the Tube and Tube Ring drawings and for your viewing enjoyment. 

What I find most interesting and has me pondering is the initial date on the drawings of Dec 10, 1941.  Considering what happened three days before that makes you wonder if they had been going along, reviewing specs at a leisurely pace but it all changed that Sunday morning and they had to get things done.  

As the folks at the Meriden Historical Society told me…”Stay tuned” and I’ll see if they have any luck this week locating the other two drawings. 






Back to Top
Marty Black View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Editor in Chief Emeritus

Joined: Dec 30 2015
Location: Pismo Beach, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 100339
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Marty Black Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 25 2017 at 5:34pm
Ha! Good for you, Sling!

But naw, I didn't steal nuttin'. I went there with only one big goal in mind - I wanted to prove once and for all that ISP oilers were for Irwin-Pedersen. My minor secondary goal was to determine when - in spring 1943, International Silver stopped marking oilers (as a subcontractor) for specific carbine manufacturers, and adopted the generic IS marking for all carbine manufacturers. But I was a dismal failure on both counts.

Although there were some documents in the Int'l Silver file, they did not contain any information of value to me. And I really wasn't interested in the blueprints of either the oilers or the mags, or the other items that Int' Silver made for the war industry....so I went back to Illinois empty-handed.   That was in the summer of 1985 - the woman whom I dealt with was Bernice Morehouse.

I've got some oiler and magazine manufacturing notes that she typed up for me. I'll scan them tonight and ask Ted S to post them in this thread, so everyone can have a look.

Congrats, Marty Black
Marty Black
Back to Top
Marty Black View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Editor in Chief Emeritus

Joined: Dec 30 2015
Location: Pismo Beach, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 100339
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Marty Black Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 25 2017 at 6:01pm
Actually, looking at Mrs. Morehouse's letter again after 30 years or more, I see that she mentions that International Silver stopped marking their magazines with the II, IW, etc in April 1943 (and presumably went with the generic IS).

This may also be the time that International Silver stopped marking their oilers for the carbine manufacturers and adopted the generic IS marking. Makes sense to me.....

Re: the oiler markings, International Silver made two requests to the Carbine Industry Integrating Committee (CIIC). Their first letter, dated Jan 14, 1943 and sent via the Springfield Ordnance District, requested to eliminate the prime contractor marking from their oilers and use only a generic IS marking. On Jan 25, 1943, another letter was sent, this time directly to the Committee requesting to either use the generic IS marking, or eliminate the marking altogether (because they were the only company making oilers for the carbine industry.) See Carbine Club newsletter 253.

I imagine that Ordnance and the CIIC had a lot on their plate in February 1943 with the Carbine Industry Expansion Program, among a myriad of other high priorities that needed their immediate attention...and it may have taken until April 1943 before the IS marking decision was reached.

Regards, Marty Black





Back to Top
sling00 View Drop Down
Hard Corps
Hard Corps


Joined: Apr 21 2016
Location: Tennessee
Status: Offline
Points: 941
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sling00 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 30 2017 at 6:55am
That is very interesting and thanks for sharing.  We just need the ingredients now that we have the recipes.

As for my latest Meriden oilers update it is unfortunate that the two drawings not in the book, especially the one for the cap I so desperately wanted, could not be located.  However he did send me a picture of a photo that was on the cover page for that section of the oilers.  He sent it as a pdf so I've had to copy and paste into Paint to make a jpg.  (That in itself was a challenge to my computer skills).  Take note of the picture's title and then checkout the end of the two oilers laying down.  They are II.  I don't think this is any big deal and requires re-writing the book on which oiler went with which carbine.  I do wonder if this was so early on that the carbine, having been a Winchester prototype was being referred to as a Winchester Carbine?  Also the knurling on the caps looks like knobby off-road tires.

 
 
Back to Top
Marty Black View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Editor in Chief Emeritus

Joined: Dec 30 2015
Location: Pismo Beach, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 100339
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Marty Black Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 30 2017 at 10:49am
Thanks Sling....I am quite certain that the term "Winchester Carbine," was often used during WWII - especially in Connecticut (home of Winchester's factory), as ONLY an acknowledgement of their invention. And over the years, we've seen Winchester-sponsored WWII-vintage ads and newspaper articles refer to the M1 Carbine as the "Winchester carbine." Besides, the word "Winchester" has always had more "sex appeal" than the word Inland. :)

Plus, Mrs. Morehouse's notes (middle of 1st page) above imply that Winchester placed the first order with International Silver for oilers in March 1942. But Inland surely had an order in, at about the same time, because Inland delivered their first carbines in June, 3 months ahead of Winchester.

But, while Connecticut was singing the praises of their hometown boy Winchester, we know that Ohio was singing the praises of Inland! :) I wouldn't "read anything" into the title of that photo, alongside II oilers. I doubt the photographer paid any attention to the markings.   

Regards, MB
Marty Black
Back to Top
sling00 View Drop Down
Hard Corps
Hard Corps


Joined: Apr 21 2016
Location: Tennessee
Status: Offline
Points: 941
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote sling00 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Nov 14 2023 at 7:07am
Good morning all,
Perusing oilers on an online auction site, I was reminded of the questionable authenticity of some oilers.  aka some are fakes.  So on behalf of new members and those of us who forget, keep in mind some oilers are not genuine USGI.  Fortunately, and to those sellers credit, some descriptions do not say they are USGI but emphasis the markings.  Beware of semantics. For others the seller may just not know.  Same thing with mag pouches.   In any case just a friendly reminder.   
Back to Top
Smokpole View Drop Down
Hard Corps
Hard Corps
Avatar

Joined: Oct 21 2019
Location: Madison ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 1057
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Smokpole Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Nov 16 2023 at 6:59pm
Now for a bit of trivia....The term "coining" comes from...you guessed it the edges of coins. Now why were the edges of coins made that way? It was to prevent anyone from shaving a tiny bit of gold or silver from the edge of the coin and reducing the amount of gold or silver in that coin thus reducing the amount of precious metal in the coin and hence reducing the weight/actual metal value of the coin.
OGCA Life member
NRA Life member
Ashtabula Rod and Gun Life member
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.