Click on the image above to learn more about the M1 Carbine
|
My First Carbine |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | |
Chuck70
Recruit Joined: Jun 24 2018 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 34 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: Feb 07 2019 at 7:26am |
Thanks @New2bras, I see my model listed at 116.95, thanks again.
|
|
Charles Wilson
|
|
New2brass
Moderator Group Dan Pinto, Photo Editor Joined: Nov 29 2015 Location: CT Status: Offline Points: 4664 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Another thread with questions on cracked bolts and receivers
http://www.uscarbinecal30.com/forum/cracked-bolts-slides-and-receivers_topic3672.html @Chuck, not what your looking for but some info and catalogs http://www.uscarbinecal30.com/forum/universal-teflon-coated-m1-carbine-in-6970-catlg_topic1220.html |
|
Chuck70
Recruit Joined: Jun 24 2018 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 34 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
My neighbor said that his brother ordered everything from the sears catalog. Does anyone have a sears catalog from 50 years ago?
|
|
Charles Wilson
|
|
tenOCEE
Hard Corps Knows rear sights! Joined: Jan 01 2016 Location: East Tenn Status: Offline Points: 1330 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
....
|
|
sleeplessnashadow
Admin Group Joined: Nov 09 2015 Location: SoCal Status: Offline Points: 1150 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
tenOCEE
I don't think anyone is thinking you are lying. Just trying to get more details to help understand. To know where the damage was on the other would be helpful. I've asked a couple people to have a look at your pics for their opinions. Their background is beyond mine. I'm not a gunsmith. Just have experience with a bunch of these but I'm not alone. It would be helpful to have a couple more pics. One looking down on the right side of the receiver showing the upthrust in the slide track and the area that looks like a crack. With the receiver horizontal instead of from left or right. Also one looking up into the slide track where it bows upwards showing the area below what appears to be a crack. I'm tempted to take you up on your offer of a sale. I'm hesitant only because of the time lag in this stupid State I live in that has a 10 day wait after it arrives and I can get to the FFL to do the paperwork. Different topic to avoid here as it detracts from the focus. The info I have, which includes the tool and die guy at Universal 1979-1984, has indicated all of Universal's receivers were milled from forged steel. With the exception of 1969-1972 those investors tried cast receivers. I have yet to find a Universal receiver that was cast. The extra pics could help with this too. One thing I'd do is have the receiver hardness checked in several places. To rule out or confirm if it's out of spec. I no longer have a hardness tester but several local metal shops will do it for less than $20 absent a report on the outcome. If you can recall the damage the other one had besides the bowed slide track and what appeared to be a crack it may help too. If not, no biggee. I appreciate you sharing this with us as I keep track of these and look for patterns within serial number blocks. One example isn't enough. But 3 examples is what prompted the addition of the 1969-1972 info and pics to the web page. It's the help from others willing to share that have made these web pages happen. We can accomplish more together than we can alone regardless of how much experience any one person has. Thanks again .... Jim |
|
tenOCEE
Hard Corps Knows rear sights! Joined: Jan 01 2016 Location: East Tenn Status: Offline Points: 1330 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Then have yours tested and magnafluxed. You missed where I posted why he brought it. Are you saying I'm lying?
|
|
RClark9595
On Point Joined: Oct 30 2017 Location: WVC Utah Status: Offline Points: 136 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
tenOCEE
For me to pass judgement on the crack and determine if it is safe to use or not, I'd need to have it X-rayed or at least magnafluxed to determine if it's just a surface crack or goes deeper. One other question, this second carbine that the owner said blew up and parts went flying, can I ask, what parts, if you looked at the gun at all, and the gun blew up as he said, surely you'd see the damage and what parts were missing. A blown up gun would show much more damage than just a bulge and a crack. Also found it strange he wouldn't sell to you, I wonder why he brought it to a gun show in the first place, a gun that blew up can't be worth very much. I'm sure Jim would be very interested in looking at it. |
|
Ron
USAF 4535 CCTS F4 Combat Crew Training Vietnam era Vet. |
|
tenOCEE
Hard Corps Knows rear sights! Joined: Jan 01 2016 Location: East Tenn Status: Offline Points: 1330 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
tenOCEE
Hard Corps Knows rear sights! Joined: Jan 01 2016 Location: East Tenn Status: Offline Points: 1330 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
...
|
|
sleeplessnashadow
Admin Group Joined: Nov 09 2015 Location: SoCal Status: Offline Points: 1150 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey guys
tenOCEE ... a few questions ... - I'm sorry but please remind me when we communicated about Universals. I get so much e-mail sometimes I can't keep track of who is who without a reminder - Was the one you have shown in the pics with the damaged receiver the one you contact me about? - It would also help to know the serial number. You can pm me with it if you don't wish to put it on the forum - Was the receiver like this when you bought the carbine, or did it happen while you were firing it? A little background.... One of the reasons I started working on the history of Universal and the carbines they made was all the info on the internet about how bad they were, how unsafe they were, etc. This made them a primary target for a good deal of my research efforts. Part of the research was I searched the internet for stories, pictures etc of people who had experienced problems with a Universal. What I found was many people had heard or read about the issues somewhere other than first hand. The few I could locate that had experienced a problem none had taken it to a gunsmith to determine the cause, none no longer had the carbine (as to be expected), none had photos, and the list goes on. Not faulting anyone but getting to the source of the problem requires details. Over time I've obtained info with details on about a dozen Universals that have had issues. Keeping in mind they made carbines from 1962 - 1984 with about 360,000 of them being the hybrid design that started at s/n 100,000. Also keep in mind there are certain things with the design of all semi-auto center-fire rifles, not just carbines, that can go wrong for a variety of reasons unrelated to who made the gun. Inevitably some people look at who made it and draw conclusions unrelated to finding out exactly what went wrong and why. So I look and ask for details. Universal did have a run of poor decisions, changes and quality control 1969-1972 after a group of investors bought the controlling interest in Universal and started implementing changes focused on profit without regard to function and safety. A few months back I expanded one of the pages on Universal to include the issues 1969-1972. Scroll down to Changes & Dark Days 1969-1972. Be sure to read all the way to the bottom. http://www.m1carbinesinc.com/carbine_universal2.html The investors were bought out and things were put back on track 1975-1984. One reason why I asked about the serial number. I don't have the exact serial number cut off of start and finish for the investment group. The restart in 1975 started with s/n 300,000 to separate the new ones from the prior ones. The lowest s/n I'm aware of that had problems is in the 165,000 range. I've personally owned and/or examined and fired a number of Universals between s/n 107957 and 137120 without any issues. Many more with s/n's above 300,000. Having personally safety inspected each one before firing as I do with almost every carbine before firing. Even new commercial carbines and GI carbines. To include checking the headspace. A critical element for every center-fire semi-auto rifle that most people don't do or have done. If it hasn't been safety inspected and something goes wrong there is no standard by which to judge what was right or wrong in the first place. Now, to the carbine in the photos that has the damage.... The bulge along the top of the track the slide moves back and forth on is something I've encountered before. But not specific to any one manufacture and not just with commercial carbines. There are a couple of things that can cause it. Improper hardening of the receiver. Take a look at the receivers on the following two pages. By Ermas Manufacturing in Steelville, OH. They didn't harden their receivers. http://www.m1carbinesinc.com/carbine_ermas2.html http://www.m1carbinesinc.com/carbine_ermas.html Then take a look at the next page on the current commercial Inland Mfg carbines. Different issue and not as obvious as those by Eras, this issue was improper casting of the receiver that resulted in warped receivers. With the warping not consistently in the same spot. http://www.m1carbinesinc.com/carbine_inland.html The #1 cause for the bent slide track with other carbines, GI included, has been damage either building up over time or immediate from improper headspace, out of battery firing, or a number of other things related to a pressure build up in the chamber that overcame the locking bolt lugs and bulged the receiver to various degrees. Where the receiver bulges is where the notch that travels in the receiver slide channel was when the burst vented or the round went off. With too much headspace usually there is also damage to the receiver where the right and left bolt lugs sit locked but not always. Too little headspace can cause the out of battery firing as can a number of other things. Longitudinal cracks along the top of the receiver are a rarity. Would like to see a couple close ups from different angles of what looks like a crack. I'm gonna stop for now. One last thing. As you pull the slide handle to the rear note at what point the slide's left lug reaches the dismount notch on the left side of the barrel and where the slide's lug at the handle is while traveling backwards down the right side of the receiver. Sorry, tired. Been up all nite. tenOCEE ... is the barrel still attached to that receiver? Jim |
|
floydthecat
Hard Corps Joined: Oct 13 2016 Location: Mississippi Status: Offline Points: 1998 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I guess you’d need to see a slow-mo of one cracking under fire in that particular spot on the receiver, well to the rear of the bolt lug and buckled up about half-way down the rail.
|
|
tenOCEE
Hard Corps Knows rear sights! Joined: Jan 01 2016 Location: East Tenn Status: Offline Points: 1330 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
...
|
|
RClark9595
On Point Joined: Oct 30 2017 Location: WVC Utah Status: Offline Points: 136 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
tenOCEE
This just floors me, I've never heard of this issue before now, I wonder for how many years has this been going on and nobody knew. Question now is, does this affect all Universals or just a few, can they be inspected for this thin area before it causes damage? A lot has to be wrong for a round to go off before fully chambered (out of battery), and if it does it'll cause a lot of damage and is extremely dangerous. What does Jim have to say, has he seen this before, if anyone has surely it would be him? Someone should have reported this long before now, a gun prone to going off out of battery would grab a lot of attention.
Now I have to ask, what is so wrong with a gen two gun, other than it is not USGI, Universal never claimed it was, it's just a. shoot alike, look alike, that's a good lesser expensive alternative when USGI guns are expensive and hard to get. |
|
Ron
USAF 4535 CCTS F4 Combat Crew Training Vietnam era Vet. |
|
tenOCEE
Hard Corps Knows rear sights! Joined: Jan 01 2016 Location: East Tenn Status: Offline Points: 1330 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Never expected I'd be, but I'm a fan of the earliest first gens.
|
|
floydthecat
Hard Corps Joined: Oct 13 2016 Location: Mississippi Status: Offline Points: 1998 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
GI furniture will mount on a Universal Gen-1. I have one of the early Gen-1's and the only thing Universal is the barrel and receiver. The wood and all internals are USGI. |
|
New2brass
Moderator Group Dan Pinto, Photo Editor Joined: Nov 29 2015 Location: CT Status: Offline Points: 4664 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Like most things, the information was thought to be correct when published. The advantage of the club is updating information as it is found.
WB3 shows J as only parkerized. we now know there are blued ones. The angled bolster was also seen on I think all hardbacks. Splitbacks AYP, Unmarked (USGI and reproduction) had the angled bolster. Here is the kink, There are possible reproductions of AYP, SEY, AI over M2, A.I. Some of these have been observed with the rectangular bolster. Someone once asked why are you buying that obvious fake item. By having these items on hand I can photograph and present a visual for others to understand. So again, I am interested in any of those I do not have. Reproductions as well. |
|
W5USMC
Moderator Group Joined: Apr 29 2017 Location: Missouri Status: Offline Points: 2966 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Dan, what caught my eye on the magazine that Chuck posted the picture of is the angled base plate retaining lip (bolster?) which according to CCNL 332-3 was only found on the Seymore "hardbacks" and the Jahn and OKay "welded" 30 rounders. |
|
Wayne
USMC Retired NRA Life Member |
|
tenOCEE
Hard Corps Knows rear sights! Joined: Jan 01 2016 Location: East Tenn Status: Offline Points: 1330 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The actual point of the pictures is to show the result, and that it's not rumor, and it's not due to condition. How often do two identical firearms walk in a show by 2 diff people with identical KB? I've owned about 10 different makes of commercial. That weak part breaking is the result of out of battery most likely. The out of battery issue is what everyone sites and it's specifically valid, but people don't seem to understand because you see them continually openly suggest that it's not a risk or theirs must not be at risk because they've shot it repeatedly and it's one of their best shooters. Sometimes it sounds like mysticism to them I think. The stellar condition of this particular Carbine which has almost NO wear still grenaded anyway. If you have a working one of these I suggest you get rid of it while it works and before you end up with at best 200 worth of remaining parts after it happens. The second one that walked in that show wasn't as nice but he said something hit him in the face when it blew up. Identical problem. Same era of gun.
|
|
Why Carbines?
Hard Corps Joined: Dec 27 2015 Location: Tennessee Status: Offline Points: 883 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The J marked ones I have always thought were made by Jahn. I have one or two in my magazine ( Lol, NOT clip! ) collection. I have also had the opportunity to buy some of the Jay Scott ones over the years, but have passed due to lack of enthusiasm. Still, I may add one or two of them yet to my mag hoard, but I'm in the getting rid of stuff mode now not the acquiring mode. Btw, I love that old jay scott box, have never seen one before.
|
|
RClark9595
On Point Joined: Oct 30 2017 Location: WVC Utah Status: Offline Points: 136 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
tenOCEE
So if I understand correctly, these weak spots can cause the gun to fire out of battery, is that right? That is the only way it can blow up in a persons face. |
|
Ron
USAF 4535 CCTS F4 Combat Crew Training Vietnam era Vet. |
|
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |