The Carbine Collectors Club

Click on the image above to learn more about the M1 Carbine


Forum Home Forum Home > The Club > General Discussion > Parts Markings
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login


Double Transfer Receiver Listed on GunBroker

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Nevinator View Drop Down
Recruit
Recruit
Avatar

Joined: Jan 28 2018
Location: Conroe, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 91
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nevinator Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Double Transfer Receiver Listed on GunBroker
    Posted: Apr 29 2019 at 9:20am
This listing is currently on GunBroker.  A Receiver Marked SG that also has a Inland Lineout to Underwood.  Strange to say the least.

I have no interest in buying it because of the Blue Sky import markings, but I am interested in the history on this.  I can’t seem to find any reference in War Baby (1 or 3) to an Inland lineout to Underwood being passed to SG, or vice versa.  Anyone have any ideas?


Retired First Sergeant, U.S. Army
Retired LEO
VFW Life Member
NRA Life Member
Back to Top
W5USMC View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: Apr 29 2017
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Points: 2959
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote W5USMC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Apr 29 2019 at 10:52am
Not sure this should be considered a double transfer. Saginaw was sub-contracted to make receivers for inland, at first they were marked SI on the side (700xxx-709xxx ser range), later they were marked SG (710xxx-951xxx ser range).
Inland transferred approx. 12210 receivers to Underwood from late 42 to late 43. There are examples pictured in CCNL 230, of SI and SG marked Inland receivers being transferred to Underwood. Note the Underwood "Ord Bomb" on the receiver bevel pictured in the listing.
Wayne
USMC Retired
NRA Life Member
Back to Top
Nevinator View Drop Down
Recruit
Recruit
Avatar

Joined: Jan 28 2018
Location: Conroe, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 91
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nevinator Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Apr 29 2019 at 11:48am
Thank you. I knew about the inland transfers to Underwood, but did not know that SG subcontracted any of their receivers. That is great info. 
Retired First Sergeant, U.S. Army
Retired LEO
VFW Life Member
NRA Life Member
Back to Top
New2brass View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Dan Pinto, Photo Editor

Joined: Nov 29 2015
Location: CT
Status: Offline
Points: 4657
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote New2brass Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Apr 29 2019 at 2:16pm
The wording of double transfer is incorrect. It is a subcontracted receiver that went to the prime contractor and then the prime contractor transferred to another prime contractor.

It is the same with the AO made IBM receivers which were sent to others.


SG was making subcontracted receivers for Inland before they produced carbines.


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.090 seconds.